Catalyst Wealth Partners
Wellington-Altus Private Wealth

August Market Insights: The Unreasonable Rally

Why America’s reset could propel the S&P 500 to 7,500

“The reasonable man adapts himself to the world: the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself. Therefore all progress depends on the unreasonable man.” – George Bernard Shaw, Maxims for Revolutionists

The new American framework for a 7,500 S&P 500

In a year marked by fiscal surprises and technological upheaval, America stands at a crossroads. The June 2025 budget surplus has upended the old narratives, leaving Wall Street’s perennial skeptics scrambling for new alarms. Yet beneath the noise, a deeper transformation is underway.

U.S. President Donald Trump’s “Liberation Day” has reset the economic cycle, setting the stage for a historic rally that could drive the S&P 500 to 7,500 by spring 2026, a target rooted in nearly a century of market data.

Meanwhile, the rise of blockchain, bitcoin’s breakout, and landmark legislation like the Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for U.S. Stablecoins Act (GENIUS Act) and Digital Asset Market Clarity Act of 2025 (CLARITY Act) are rewriting the rules of global finance. As the focus shifts from old orthodoxies to pragmatic innovation, investors face a rare opportunity: adapt to the new reality—or be left behind.

This is the story of America’s unreasonable rally, where the bold, not the cautious, will reshape the backbone of the 21st-century economy. This timeless observation by Shaw perfectly frames the moment America finds itself in, a nation at the crossroads of fiscal transformation, technological upheaval, and a reawakening of pragmatic innovation. As the U.S. posts a rare $27 billion budget surplus in June 2025, the chorus of Wall Street elites and bond vigilantes—those “reasonable” guardians of orthodoxy—suddenly find their well-worn complaints losing traction. The unreasonable innovators, meanwhile, are busy rewriting the rules. The upshot—smart investors don’t complain, they just adapt and ignore the noise.

A new fiscal reality

The June surplus, driven by a surge in tariff revenues and a sharp reduction in government spending, caught economists off guard. Tariff collections soared to U.S. $27 billion for the month, quadrupling compared to a year ago, as Trump’s aggressive trade policies took hold. Government outlays dropped by U.S. $187 billion, a testament to efforts at fiscal discipline and efficiency. For all the noise about runaway deficits, the numbers tell a different story, at least for now.

Yet, even as the headlines trumpet fiscal improvement, the broader deficit remains a challenge. Interest on the national debt is still a heavy burden, and the annual deficit stands at over U.S. $1.3 trillion. But the surplus is a reminder that fiscal outcomes are not set in stone, and that policy shifts, however controversial, can yield unexpected results.

The bond vigilantes: crying wolf?

Bond vigilantes, those institutional investors who sell off government bonds at the first sign of fiscal irresponsibility, have long wielded outsized influence over policy debates. Their warnings of soaring yields and economic instability have often shaped the narrative in Washington and on Wall Street. But with the June surplus, their usual script is wearing thin. What happens when the dire predictions don’t materialize? The answer, it seems, is to move the goalposts. If it’s not the deficit, it’s inflation; if not inflation, it’s the spectre of regulatory uncertainty or geopolitical risk. The bond vigilantes thrive on fear, but the facts are increasingly inconvenient for their narrative. Yes Virginia, Wall Street has a cottage industry of Cassandras.

Trump’s supply-side reset

Much of the establishment’s anxiety has centred on Trump’s supply-side policies, particularly his tax cuts for the middle class. Critics argue that such measures are reckless, yet the data tells a more nuanced story. The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act delivered real savings for American families, nearly doubling the standard deduction and expanding the child tax credit. While debate continues over the distributional effects, it’s clear that Main Street, not just Wall Street, has benefited.

Trump’s approach has been likened to a hard reset of the economic cycle, a Liberation Day that reboots the system and sets the stage for a new era of growth. Historical cycles suggest that such resets can precede powerful rallies, with some analysts forecasting the S&P 500 to reach as high as 7,500 by spring 2026. This bold projection is grounded in nearly a century of market data, echoing the pattern that progress is often driven by those willing to challenge the status quo.

Inflation: the myth that won’t die

U.S. Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell’s inflation warnings have become a fixture of the economic landscape. Yet, inflation has moderated, and the Federal Reserve has responded by lowering rates, bringing the federal funds rate down to a range of 4.25-4.5 per cent. The U.S. labour market remains stable, and gross domestic product (GDP) growth is solid. The supposed inflationary spiral has not materialized, much to the dismay of those who profit from panic.

The inflation scare, like so many others before it, is just another myth in the endless cycle of market narratives. As the facts change, so too do the stories told by the financial media and their Wall Street allies.

America’s blockchain moment

While the old guard wrings its hands over deficits and inflation, a new revolution is quietly reshaping the financial landscape. America is poised to become the blockchain superpower, thanks to the landmark GENIUS and CLARITY Acts.

Just as double-entry bookkeeping transformed commerce centuries ago, blockchain’s “triple-entry” system promises to revolutionize trust, transparency, and efficiency in finance. Blockchain technology introduces an immutable, decentralized ledger—a cryptographically secure record distributed across a global network. Trust is no longer vested in central authorities, but embedded in code.

Implications:

  • Instant settlement and reduced fraud
  • Democratized access and programmable contracts
  • A new architecture for finance: more efficient, secure,
    and inclusive GENIUS and CLARITY Acts—regulatory
    clarity at last

The GENIUS Act establishes strict rules for stablecoins, requiring full reserves and transparency. This not only bolsters the U.S. dollar’s global dominance but also draws capital into U.S. Treasuries, reinforcing financial stability. The CLARITY Act, meanwhile, finally divides oversight between the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), ending years of regulatory ambiguity that stifled innovation.

Together, these acts harmonize regulation and free markets, echoing economist Adam Smith’s vision that prosperity arises from clear rules and entrepreneurial drive. Tokenization and instant settlement promise more inclusive, efficient markets. The era of Wall Street, the Federal Reserve, and Washington, D.C. as obstacles to innovation is ending.

Blockchain as the backbone of the digital economy

The internet revolutionized information and communication, but it was never designed for global finance. Today’s patchwork of intermediaries—banks, clearinghouses, payment processors—adds friction and cost. Blockchain is the steam engine of the digital economy, returning ownership and control to users and enabling peer-to-peer value transfer. Stablecoins, digital tokens pegged to the U.S. dollar, are transforming global finance. As foreign holdings of U.S. debt decline, stablecoin issuers have amassed over U.S. $120 billion in treasury bills, reinforcing dollar dominance and filling a void left by retreating traditional investors.

The global language of payments: ISO 20022

A new global standard, ISO 20022, is replacing the old Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunication (SWIFT) messaging system. This upgrade enables banks and payment systems worldwide to communicate seamlessly, with rich data and instant settlement. RippleNet, powered by the digital asset XRP, is fully compliant—allowing XRP to act as a bridge currency for fast, low-cost cross border payments.

The narrative has shifted. Blockchain and digital assets are not speculative bubbles or scams—they are the rails on which the digital economy runs. With strict regulation, regular audits, and global standards, these technologies have earned the trust of institutions and individuals alike.

The story of blockchain and digital assets is one of evolution, not revolution. What began as a challenge to the status quo is now the foundation for a more efficient, secure, and inclusive global economy. The world no longer asks if blockchain is a scam—it asks how quickly it can build on this new backbone.

Wall Street’s coming disruption

Wall Street’s infrastructure, rooted in the 1960s, is ripe for disruption. Blockchain’s decentralized, transparent, and programmable design offers instant settlement, reduced costs, and enhanced security. Tokenization enables fractional ownership and global accessibility across asset classes. The transition is inevitable, even if gradual. Trump’s embrace of crypto marks a dramatic policy shift. Executive orders, regulatory reform, and the creation of a Strategic Bitcoin Reserve signal a new era. Corporate adoption of bitcoin as a treasury asset is surging, reflecting a strategic hedge against fiat currency debasement.

Since the U.S. left the gold standard in 1971, the U.S. dollar has lost purchasing power at nearly 8 per cent annually. Investors increasingly turn to scarce, non-sovereign assets like gold and bitcoin as complementary hedges against inflation and systemic risk.

The centre holds: lessons from American pragmatism

While the partisan tenor of U.S. policy debates today might suggest otherwise, America’s economic ascendancy has rarely been the product of ideological excess. Its greatest leaps have come from pragmatic, centrist policy. From Alexander Hamilton’s consolidation of state debts, through the Industrial Revolution’s embrace of innovation, to the postwar boom’s balance of private enterprise and public investment, America has prospered most when it has returned to the centre:

  • Hamilton’s blueprint: Centralizing credit and fiscal discipline brought investment and unity to a fledgling nation.
  • Industrial drive: Technological innovation and infrastructure investment transformed the U.S. into an industrial giant, fueling urbanization and a robust middle class.
  • Postwar prosperity: The convergence of pent-up demand and government support for housing and infrastructure created a golden age of growth.

The lesson for investors is clear: sustainable growth and lasting wealth creation have always flourished at the centre—not at the extremes.

Policy noise or structural shift?

The past decade has been marked by policy swings and ideological capture. The flirtation with Modern Monetary Theory (MMT) and unchecked fiscal expansion led to ballooning deficits and a Federal Reserve slow to adjust. The Phillips curve is now largely discredited; the inflationary impact of tariffs, once feared, proved overblown.

But the pendulum is swinging back to the centre, towards supply-side growth, reprivatisation, and the restoration of market discipline. The real opportunity lies not in lamenting past errors, but in positioning for the future as policy normalizes. Simple point for investors—yes, mistakes have been made; look forward and position for a secular bull market.

The supply-side renaissance

The most profound shift underway is a return to first principles: restoring the market as the engine of growth. The “Big Beautiful Bill” and the “3-3-3” plan (3 per cent GDP growth, 3 per cent budget deficit, 3 million new barrels a day of crude oil production) mark a turning point:

  • Tax cuts and deregulation aim to shrink the government’s footprint and unlock private investment.
  • A sovereign wealth fund is proposed to manage national assets with private-sector discipline, reducing reliance on debt.
  • The end of MMT: Printing and spending without consequence is over. Market signals and competition are being restored.

Smith’s invisible hand is again at the heart of economic policy. Reprivatisation is not simply about transferring assets; it is about re-establishing the private sector as the driver of growth and innovation.

The Federal Reserve’s glide path

The Federal Reserve has been slow to act, but the direction is now clear. Rate cuts are on the horizon, with their effects likely to be felt in 2026 and beyond. As the U.S. shifts from public-sector-driven growth to private-sector dynamism, volatility may increase. As the Federal Reserve takes the overnight rate to 2.75 per cent, risk will appear.

The job market growth experienced during former president Joe Biden’s administration is a mirage. As Trump’s immigration policy kicks in, we might expect to see Wall Street realize that perhaps private-sector growth in healthcare was completely driven by access to free care for undocumented immigrants possibly creating a growth scare that drives rates below 2 per cent.

Yet, the return to a market-driven model offers the prospect of renewed growth, with policy finally aligned to deliver it. Job growth among native-born American workers is already evident. But it will take time for Trump’s supply-side policies to kick in. A growth scare is my base case, but not a recession.

Navigating America’s reset and blockchain revolution

The landscape for investors is shifting rapidly. With Trump’s Liberation Day resetting the four-year cycle, markets are recalibrating. Historical data stretching back to 1934 suggests this reset could propel the S&P 500 towards a target of 7,500 by spring 2026, a bold projection grounded in precedent and cyclical analysis. This is the moment for the “unreasonable” investor, one willing to challenge orthodoxy and seize the opportunity.

Meanwhile, bitcoin is breaking out to new highs, and the tokenization of assets is accelerating. The unleashing of blockchain innovation is no longer a distant promise—it is actively reshaping Wall Street and the broader financial system.

The investor’s playbook: five rules for investors in America’s new era

  1. Recognize the cycle reset: Trump’s policies have triggered a structural reset, akin to unplugging and rebooting the economic system. This Liberation Day marks the start of a new four-year cycle, historically associated with powerful rallies. The S&P 500’s trajectory, supported by nearly a century of data, points to a potential surge towards 7,500 by spring 2026.
  2. Ride the blockchain breakout: Bitcoin’s breakout is not an isolated event. It signals a broader shift as blockchain technology enables the tokenization of traditional assets. This innovation is creating new markets, unlocking liquidity, and offering investors exposure to previously illiquid or fragmented asset classes.
  3. Diversify with conviction: Gold and bitcoin remain foundational assets for a resilient, modern portfolio. Blockchain adoption and tokenized assets add new dimensions of diversification and growth potential.
  4. Monitor U.S. policy and regulatory clarity: The GENIUS and CLARITY Acts have established a new framework for digital assets, providing much-needed regulatory certainty. Investors should stay attuned to further policy developments as America cements its leadership in the digital financial order.
  5. Prioritize agility and market discipline: As Wall Street adapts to a blockchain-driven economy, volatility and rapid change will be the norm. Embrace supply-side reforms, watch for opportunities in deregulation and reprivatisation, and remain flexible to capitalize on emerging trends.

Action points:

  • Position for growth: Consider increasing exposure to sectors and companies leading in AI, blockchain, tokenization, industrials and digital asset infrastructure, and financials.
  • Stay ahead of the curve: Use historical market cycles as a guide, but be prepared to adapt as new technologies and policies reshape the landscape.
  • Ignore the noise: The era of fear-driven narratives is fading. Focus on fundamentals, innovation, and the pragmatic centre where sustainable growth is forged.

The convergence of a political cycle reset, a bullish market outlook, and the unleashing of blockchain innovation presents a generational opportunity. Investors who recognize and adapt to these shifts will be best positioned to thrive in the years ahead.

The new centre: where policy pragmatism meets technological transformation

The historical arc of American prosperity bends towards the centre, towards pragmatic policy, market dynamism, and adaptive leadership. Today, this gravitational pull is colliding with the most profound technological shift in finance since the invention of double-entry bookkeeping. The return to centrist economic management is unfolding alongside the rise of blockchain, tokenization, and regulatory clarity that promises to redefine the very architecture of global markets.

What unites these trends is a renewed faith in both the invisible hand and the visible framework. The policy centre, once again, is proving itself as the crucible of resilience and innovation. At the same time, the regulatory and technological breakthroughs in digital assets are providing the infrastructure for trust, efficiency, and inclusion. The GENIUS and CLARITY Acts are not merely legislative milestones—they are the institutional embodiment of America’s ability to harmonize rules with risk-taking, oversight with entrepreneurial energy.

For investors, the message is clear: the centre is not just where sustainable growth is forged, but where the next great fortunes will be made. The pragmatic embrace of supply-side reforms and the institutionalization of blockchain technology are converging to create unprecedented opportunities. Those who adapt to this dual transformation, eschewing ideological rigidity and technological complacency alike, will not only profit but help shape the backbone of the 21st-century economy.

In this new era, the most successful investors will be those who recognize that the centre is no longer simply a place of compromise. It is the launchpad for the next wave of economic and technological leadership. The future belongs to those who can read both the policy signals and the historical clues and act accordingly.

Recent Posts

May Market Insights: Mastery and the Terror Premium

Mastery of energy, again

Winston Churchill, as first lord of the Admiralty, tied Britain’s fate to Persian oil. United States President Donald Trump’s war in Iran, centred on Operation Epic Fury, could do the same for the West by removing Iran’s nuclear shadow, resetting oil toward US$60, and finally unlocking a modern peace dividend.

“Mastery itself was the prize of the venture.” Winston Churchill’s 1912–13 case for converting the Royal Navy from coal to oil—enshrined in historian Daniel Yergin’s The Prize: The Epic Quest for Oil, Money, and Power captured the brutal clarity of a great power energy strategy: accept dependence to command the seas. That wager framed the last century. In 2026, as Epic Fury grinds through the Gulf and Brent trades above US$100, the question is no longer whether oil confers mastery, but who holds it: a revolutionary theocracy astride the Strait of Hormuz, or a West intent on stripping the terror and nuclear risk now priced into every barrel out of the energy system—finally collecting a long‑deferred peace dividend.

Churchill’s shift bound Britain’s prosperity to distant wells and narrow waterways, welding energy supply to national survival. He understood that control of energy was not an adjunct to power, it was the metric. In April 2026, with Hormuz contested and Iranian missiles demonstrating reach beyond the Middle East, the same dilemma confronts policymakers and markets. Does the West still want that prize, and what is it prepared to stake to reclaim it from a regime that has spent half a century turning oil, terror, and nuclear brinkmanship into interchangeable tools of coercion? Assume Trump’s campaign does what it is now on course to do: not merely reopen a chokepoint, but neutralize a nascent tactical nuclear threat which, left intact, would hardwire a doomsday premium into global energy prices for a generation.

Iran’s war with the West has done what decades of shocks, embargoes, and “maximum pressure” could not: it has made the hidden tax on energy legible even on a Bloomberg screen. Strip out the terror and nuclear‑risk premiums in a post‑Trump‑Iran settlement, and Brent does not belong north of US$100; it sits much closer to the US$60 level implied by underlying supply and demand and pre‑war bank research. The gap between where oil trades in a world held hostage by a nuclear‑ambitious theocracy at Hormuz and where it would trade if flows were secure and de‑weaponized is more than a volatility surface. It is the unclaimed peace dividend of globalization, the energy market analogue of the windfall that followed the end of the Cold War, when the removal of an existential nuclear standoff released capital, confidence, and capacity back into the real economy.

The choice now facing the West is whether to lock in that outcome. Ending the Cold War removed the Sword of Damocles that had hung over every investment decision for half a century; a successful conclusion to Iran’s nuclear extortion would do something similar for the 21st‑century economy, collapsing a structural risk premium that has quietly taxed households, corporates, and sovereigns alike. The question, as Churchill would have recognized, is whether the West is prepared not just to win on the battlefield but to consolidate that victory into a new era of energy mastery, and to treat the potential verified removal of Iran’s enriched stockpile and fuel‑cycle capabilities as a security gain on the scale of the 1987 Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty or the dissolution of the Soviet arsenal.

For Europe, the stakes are not abstract. Iranian missiles and drones have already shown that European Union territory and NATO logistics hubs sit uncomfortably close to the new strike envelope, shattering the illusion that Gulf risk could be quarantined to energy prices alone. The deeper reckoning is with Europe’s own energy strategy. The choice by many Western governments to anchor industrial policy primarily on climate targets while neglecting cheap and secure supply—is now coming home to roost. Prosperity in an artificial intelligence (AI)‑driven economy rests on abundant, reliable energy rather than on cheap consumer imports, echoing Churchill’s insight that mastery of energy is mastery of power. That logic points north as well as east: Canada with its hydrocarbons, hydropower, and critical minerals—looks less like a peripheral supplier and more like a potential resource superpower if it can cut through regulatory thickets and build the infrastructure to deliver secure barrels, electrons, and metals to allied markets.

U.S. hard power, the security backstop European, Canadian, and the United Kingdom economies long treated as a law of nature, now looks more contingent, more politically conditional, and more thinly spread across theatres. One could easily imagine Washington reverting to a post‑First World War stance, turning inward to rebuild its real economy, and no longer willing or able to offer security as a global public good. A successful Trump‑led settlement that removes both the nuclear overhang and the Hormuz chokepoint as instruments of coercion would not only stabilize Atlantic world energy supply but also underwrite a more credible NATO deterrent at lower long‑run cost—replacing the ersatz “peace dividend” of underfunded defence with a genuine one built on reduced threat rather than wishful budgeting.

For investors, a decisive outcome in Iran would not just redraw maps in the Gulf; it would refashion term premia. As the nuclear and terror discounts bleed out of the curve, gilt yields and U.S. Treasuries alike would begin to reflect lower expected inflation and slimmer risk premia rather than recurring energy shocks. Credit spreads-particularly for energy‑intensive sectors and fragile sovereigns—would compress as balance of payments and default risks ease. Equity markets would reprice in turn: structurally lower input costs and a thinner geopolitical risk layer would lift margins in manufacturing, transport, and consumer names, even as oil majors and defence stocks surrender some of their crisis rent. For the Square Mile and Wall Street, the real prize is not another trade on US$120 Brent; it is the re‑rating that comes when a structural doomsday premium is finally taken out of the system and the peace dividend—deferred since the end of the Cold War and repeatedly eroded by Iran—at last starts to be paid in cash flows rather than communiqués.

Churchill’s ghost at Hormuz

On the first day of April 2026, as Brent traded just above US$100, the world was relearning what Churchill meant when he called mastery the prize. As first lord of the Admiralty, he forced the Royal Navy off domestic coal and onto Persian oil, then secured that lifeblood by buying control of Anglo‑Persian Oil. He knew the bargain: oil conferred speed and reach, but at the price of dependence on distant fields and fragile sea lanes. Hence his warning to Parliament in 1913 that “on no one quality, on no one process, on no one country, on no one route, and on no one field must we be dependent” and his insistence that safety and certainty in oil lay “in variety, and in variety alone.”

That decision created the modern energy system and placed Iran at its centre. Four decades later, as prime minister, Churchill confronted the second act of his own gamble when Iran’s prime minister Mohammad Mossadegh nationalized Anglo‑Iranian Oil Company’s assets. The 1953 coup that restored the Shah was less a morality play than a confirmation that control over Iranian oil would be contested by empires, nationalists, and, eventually, revolutionaries. Churchill’s instinct to secure supply at the source and to dominate the sea lanes that connected it to Britain established a strategic architecture with a simple premise: mastery of energy flows was indistinguishable from mastery of global power.

The twist came in 1979, when that architecture was seized by those it had previously constrained. The Iranian Revolution toppled the Shah and installed Ayatollah Khomeini’s theocracy—a regime that viewed the U.S. as the “Great Satan,” embraced terrorism as statecraft, and sat astride the Strait of Hormuz. Oil workers struck, production collapsed, and prices more than doubled. The world discovered that the geographic fulcrum Churchill had chosen could just as easily be pulled by a revolutionary fist. From that moment, the markets began to price an Iran terror premium. It was distinct from OPEC’s cartel pricing power or conventional war risk. It recognized that a state sponsor of terrorism—with a web of proxies and control over the narrow channel through which roughly a fifth of seaborne oil must pass—would periodically weaponize that position. Each tanker attack in the 1980s “Tanker War,” each Hezbollah bombing, each missile launched at a Gulf facility added a sliver to that premium. Over time, slivers hardened into a slab.

Churchill’s maxim was inverted. Variety still existed geologically, with new barrels from the North Sea, Alaska, and deepwater, but strategically the system was again anchored on a single actor most willing to turn energy into a cudgel. Where Churchill had sought safety through variety, the world lived with uncertainty concentrated in one revolutionary capital. And where he had seen mastery as the prize of bold, deliberate ventures, mastery of energy risk quietly migrated to a regime that treated terror as an operating model.

How terror became a line item

The terror premium is no longer an academic calculation; it is a visible spread. In calmer phases of the cycle, geopolitical risk barely nudges price forecasts. In crisis, as in early 2026, the gap between pre‑war expectations for oil and the levels seen when Hormuz is threatened yawns wider, and futures curves kink as traders try to price the possibility of disruption. Even if part of that is fear and temporality, the underlying message is obvious. There is a structural surcharge on every barrel to account for the probability that Tehran or one of its proxies will, at some point, take terrorist action.

That surcharge has a history. The 1973–74 oil embargo revealed how quickly geopolitics could quadruple prices, but Iran was then still an ally. The true discontinuity came with the 1979 revolution and the Iran‑Iraq War. The Tanker War saw mines in the Gulf, neutral shipping attacked, and U.S. naval forces drawn in to reflag and escort tankers. Washington’s 1984 decision to designate Iran a state sponsor of terrorism, off the back of Hezbollah’s bombing of U.S. Marines in Beirut, made explicit what markets had intuited: one of the central suppliers to the system was also its most committed saboteur.

Read More »

Highlights from the 2026 Spring Economic Update

On April 28, 2026, Finance and National Revenue Minister François-Philippe Champagne released the 2026
Spring Economic Update (the Update). This was the first spring economic update after the federal budget was
moved to the fall in 2025. In the absence of a federal budget earlier this year and with the recent shift to a
majority government, Canadians have been awaiting clear direction on the federal government’s policy
focus and anticipated initiatives. Overall, the Update introduces relatively little that had not been previously
announced, while showing an improved fiscal outlook, with the projected deficit declining despite $37.5 billion
in net new spending.

Read More »

April Market Insights: Bretton Woods 2.0, the New Great Game, and Trump

U.S. President Donald Trump’s second term is not just another burst of tariff theatre; it is the opening move in a new great game over energy, artificial intelligence (AI), and money. By neutralizing Iran and Venezuela, squeezing Cuba, binding Canada, and courting Russia, Washington is trying to re-anchor oil in U.S. dollars and push BRICS’ [1] monetary ambitions to the margins. Layered on top are digital rails—dollar-backed stablecoins, tokenized Treasuries, gold, and even a strategic bitcoin reserve—designed to harden, not retire, King Dollar. If it works, Bretton Woods 2.0 will arrive not as a conference, but as the unannounced sequel to a crisis-ridden decade, with the U.S. once again writing the rules.

Read More »

March Market Insights: There is no Bronze Medal

“There’s only two cultures that are going to win in the next year. It’s going to be us or China.” The subtext of Palantir CEO Alex Karp’s widely cited speech from late 2025 sounds like tech‑bro theatre until you reflect on it. In artificial intelligence, there is no bronze medal. There will be a hegemon and a runner‑up. Everyone else will be a client.

Markets are not pricing that reality. Investors still treat the AI build-out as marginal cloud spend or another overhyped software cycle. They debate whether Big Tech is “exhausting its available capital” or whether capex “must mean revert,” as if infrastructure were optional and competition courteous. They are using valuation models from the wrong century for the wrong game.

AI is not an app store. It is a weapon system—and the operating system of the next industrial era. The capital going into it is not a bubble. It is rearmament.

Read More »

The information contained herein has been provided for information purposes only. The information has been drawn from sources believed to be reliable. Graphs, charts and other numbers are used for illustrative purposes only and do not reflect future values or future performance of any investment. The information does not provide financial, legal, tax or investment advice. Particular investment, tax, or trading strategies should be evaluated relative to each individual’s objectives and risk tolerance. This does not constitute a recommendation or solicitation to buy or sell securities of any kind. Market conditions may change which may impact the information contained in this document.  Wellington-Altus Private Wealth Inc. (WAPW) does not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of the information contained herein, nor does WAPW assume any liability for any loss that may result from the reliance by any person upon any such information or opinions.  Before acting on any of the above, please contact your financial advisor.

© 2024, Wellington-Altus Private Wealth Inc. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. NO USE OR REPRODUCTION WITHOUT PERMISSION.

www.wellington-altus.ca