Investment Insight – Winter 2026

The End of an Era—and to New Beginnings

Download PDF Here.

It is the end of an era: after 60 years at the helm, one of the world’s most closely watched investors has stepped down as CEO.

Very few people stay in one role for six decades. For context, the median tenure with a single employer dropped to 3.9 years in the U.S., while the average working life spans roughly 37 years. This puts into perspective the remarkable length of Warren Buffett’s leadership of Berkshire Hathaway—nearly twice the span of a typical career.

Even if you don’t subscribe to Buffett’s investing philosophy, the scale of his accomplishments is clear. After taking control in 1965, he transformed Berkshire from a  struggling textile mill into a multinational conglomerate holding company, growing its share price from about $19 to roughly $745,000—a cumulative gain of nearly 4,000,000 percent! In 2024, Berkshire became the first U.S. non-tech company to surpass a trillion-dollar market capitalization.

Now 95, Buffett shared in November that he was “going quiet” and will no longer write the annual letter or speak at Berkshire’s annual meeting. In his farewell, he offered reflections on both business and life.  As we begin a new year, several insights may serve as practical reminders for our own wealth management:

Succession planning takes time. Greg Abel, named as Buffett’s successor in 2021, has been groomed for many years, spending nearly three decades at Berkshire and rising to Vice Chairman in 2018. Even after the transition, Buffett plans to “keep a significant amount” of his shares until shareholders gain confidence in Abel’s  leadership.

Estate planning is fluid. Buffett has revised his estate plan many times over the years. His “unexpected longevity has unavoidable consequences” as his three children are now beyond retirement age (72, 70 and 67). He now aims to accelerate lifetime gifts to their foundations so they can fulfill his goal of distributing his entire estate while they’re alive.

Markets go up and down. While market returns have been strong in recent years, Buffett reminds us that markets—and economies—will also see difficult times: “Our stock price will move capriciously, occasionally falling 50 percent or so as has happened three times…under present management. Don’t despair; America will come back, and so will Berkshire shares.”

Our time is limited. “Father Time…is undefeated; for him, everyone ends up on his score card as wins,” Buffett notes. His advice? “Decide what you would like your obituary to say and live the life to deserve it.”

Buffett has long emphasized that money is a tool, not a purpose: “Greatness does not come about through accumulating great amounts of money, great amounts of publicity or great power in government.” Despite his accomplishments, Buffett distills success into something far simpler: “When you help someone in any of thousands of ways, you help the world. Kindness is costless but also priceless.”

Indeed, Buffett’s humility appears to have deepened with age. He acknowledges the role of luck in his successes—and the successes of many others—and admits he’s fallen short of his own ideals many times before: “I have been thoughtless countless times and made many mistakes but became very lucky in learning from some wonderful friends how to behave better.” His reminder: “The cleaning lady is as much a human being as the Chairman.”

And now, as he retires while still retaining the Chairman role, Buffett signs off with a message well-suited for a new year: “Choose your heroes very carefully and then emulate them. You’ll never be perfect, but you can always be better.” As we turn the page to 2026, here’s to a new year that inspires reflection, growth and purpose—and, as in Buffett’s case, new beginnings. Happy New Year!

In This Issue

For 2026: Make Estate Planning a Priority …………………………………………………….. 2

Equity Market Perspectives: Growth Is Expected to Continue ………………………… 2

The RRSP: Why Are We Falling Short? Debunking Two Myths ……………………………. 3

In Brief: What Is the “K-Shaped” Economy? …………………………………………………….. 3

Budget 2025: “Generational Capital Investments To Build Canada Strong” ………… 4


FINANCIAL RESOLUTION TIME

For 2026: Make Estate Planning a Priority

Happy 2026! If improving your financial well-being is on your list of New Year’s resolutions, a great place to start is with your estate plan. A comprehensive plan ensures your assets are distributed according to your wishes, while helping to maximize the legacy you leave behind.

If you already have an estate plan in place, here are five questions to ask that may prompt a review:

  1. Does my plan promote efficient administration and limit unnecessary expenses?
  2. Will my plan minimize family effort—or even potential conflict?
  3. Are my assets protected from potential liabilities, such as former spouses or creditors?
  4. Do I have safeguards in place to allow my family to make financial and healthcare decisions if I am unable?
  5. Can my family maintain their current lifestyle if I am no longer able to contribute?

Minimizing Taxes & Fees

A key goal of many estate plans is to reduce taxes and other fees. For Canadian income tax purposes, most assets—including real property and shares—are deemed to be disposed of immediately prior to death and may be subject to tax, except where certain exceptions, such as spousal rollovers, apply. Some provinces also charge probate fees, which can vary significantly. Additionally, Canadians holding U.S. situs assets, such as shares of U.S. corporations or U.S. real estate, may need to plan for potential U.S. estate tax.

While taxes and fees can create a substantial obligation for many estates, careful planning can help reduce or defer them. This may be as simple as arranging bequests differently, using life insurance to help cover tax liabilities or, for business owners, leveraging tools such as an estate freeze or the Lifetime Capital Gains Exemption to ease succession planning.

It’s More Than Just Finances

A comprehensive estate plan goes beyond maximizing the estate value passed to beneficiaries. It can also ensure fairness among heirs or protect those who may need guidance in managing assets. Trusts, for example, can help preserve assets for beneficiaries who cannot manage them independently or prevent access by creditors. By planning ahead, you can create a lasting foundation that reflects your values and helps your legacy endure across generations.

Why Not Make Estate Planning a Priority in 2026?

Like many things in life, estate planning can easily fall down the priority list. For some, the subject feels unsettling, perhaps a reminder of our own mortality. For others, it simply gets lost in the bustle of daily life. Yet establishing a basic plan, and keeping it updated as circumstances change, is one of the greatest gifts you can give to your loved ones. Being familiar with the many aspects of your financial situation, we can provide guidance, counsel or recommendations for experts in the field to assist with your estate plan.


LOOKING BELOW THE SURFACE

Equity Market Perspectives: Growth Is Expected to Continue

After equity markets continued to reach new highs in 2025, there have been renewed concerns about elevated valuations. Are stock prices outpacing underlying  fundamentals, or is there still room to run?

Many factors influence market performance—government policies, geopolitical events, economic growth, inflation, interest rates and even the headlines. Yet over the long run, one of the most powerful drivers is corporate earnings.

The earnings story, so far, has been strong. U.S. corporate margins have expanded, with the average S&P 500 net income margin climbing above 10 percent this decade, roughly double the level of the 1990s. Canadian corporate profits have followed a similar trajectory, though fluctuations in commodity prices, including a pronounced peak in 2022, have added more volatility to overall profits (graph above).

Looking ahead, several factors suggest that this growth can continue. Companies are benefiting from technological innovation, productivity gains and resilient  consumer demand, all of which support sustained earnings growth. Of course, history reminds us that earnings growth alone doesn’t guarantee high market returns. In the 1970s, despite solid earnings growth of 9.9 percent, high inflation and the global energy shocks kept equity markets subdued. Indeed, growth in markets,  economies—and even human progress—is rarely linear.

Even so, the current strength in earnings should not be overlooked. Robust corporate profits have been, and remain, a key driver of market strength. As we look ahead  to 2026, here’s to continued earnings growth to provide the fuel for markets to keep advancing.


RRSP SEASON IS HERE AGAIN

The RRSP: Why Are We Falling Short? Debunking Two Myths

While many of us are unhappy about the high taxes we pay, one way to ease the burden is by fully using tax-advantaged accounts. Yet RRSP participation rates have declined over the past two decades, from 29.1 percent of taxpayers in 2000 to just 21.7 percent in 2022. The good news: high-income earners are more likely to contribute: 66 percent of taxpayers earning between $200,000 and $500,000 contributed in 2023. But younger Canadians are falling short. The introduction of the Tax-Free Savings Account (TFSA) in 2009 may be part of the reason, but persistent misconceptions about the RRSP also play a role. Let’s address two common myths:

Myth 1: It’s better to invest in a TFSA than an RRSP. In fact, the RRSP generally yields a greater benefit if you expect a lower tax rate in retirement. In practice, many contribute to their RRSP during higher-income working years and withdraw when income is lower in retirement, leading to an advantage for the RRSP. Of course, there may be situations when the TFSA is a better choice, such as if you have a higher tax rate at withdrawal or face recovery tax for income-tested benefits like Old Age Security.

Myth 2: RRSPs aren’t worth it because withdrawals are fully taxed, whereas in non-registered accounts, only income and gains are taxed. A common complaint is that RRSP withdrawals are fully taxed at marginal rates, whereas non-registered accounts only tax income and gains (with favourable tax treatment for dividends and capital gains). While it’s true that RRSP withdrawals (usually from a Registered Retirement Income Fund (RRIF)) are taxed as income, what’s often forgotten is the initial tax deduction at contribution. Remember: a $30,000 RRSP contribution is equivalent to an after-tax contribution of $18,000 at a marginal tax rate of 40 percent. If your tax rate is the same at the time of contribution and withdrawal, you effectively receive a tax-free rate of return on your net after-tax RRSP contribution (chart). In many cases, even if your tax rate is higher at the time of withdrawal, you may be better off compared to a non-registered account due to the effect of tax-free compounding over long time periods.

While the fair market value of the RRSP/RRIF at death is generally included in the terminal tax return and taxed at marginal rates, there may be ways to mitigate the potential tax liability. This includes a tax-deferred rollover to a spouse or financially dependent (grand) child. Another way to manage the potential tax bill is to engage in a “meltdown strategy,” making withdrawals earlier when your tax rate is lower than you expect in the future or at the year of death.


MACROECONOMIC PERSPECTIVES

In Brief: What Is the “K-Shaped” Economy?

The eleventh letter of the alphabet has taken on new meaning. The letter “K” is now used to describe the bifurcation in today’s economy. Different consumer segments and the businesses that serve them are growing at different rates. Indeed, there’s a divergence: The upward-slanting arm of the “K” represents higher-income households with strong consumer spending, fuelled by healthy income growth and rising wealth. In contrast, the downward-slanting arm represents low- and middle-income households facing rising living costs, stagnant wages and higher debt burdens.

Since consumer spending drives more than two-thirds of total U.S. GDP, this divide carries implications. Higher-income households are now responsible for a disproportionate share of economic activity. In Q2 2025, the top 10 percent of income earners accounted for nearly half of all U.S. consumer spending. This imbalance underscores how economic resilience has become concentrated among wealthier consumers—those benefiting most from asset price appreciation. As a result, the softer labour-market figures observed in 2025 that largely impacted lower-income households attracted less attention as they didn’t materially affect overall  consumption.

Where are economies and markets headed in 2026? In 2025, artificial intelligence (AI) was a key driver of market enthusiasm. If AI capital investments deliver productivity gains, markets may look past ongoing labour-market weakness, effectively shrugging off the lower part of the K—although expectations may already be partly reflected in valuations. At the same time, monetary stimulus from interest rate cuts in Canada and the U.S., tariff renegotiations and potential U.S. tax refunds could strengthen labour markets and support more exposed sectors. Yet some argue the same stimulus has exacerbated wealth inequality.

As advisors, we continue to navigate the evolving landscape. The “K-shaped” economy reinforces the value of time-tested principles—diversification, a focus on quality and ongoing risk management—as key to successful long-term wealth management in an increasingly uneven economic environment.


UPDATE ON FISCAL SPENDING, DEBT & TAXES
Budget 2025: “Generational Capital Investments To Build Canada Strong”

Canada’s 2025 federal budget, delivered on November 4th instead of the usual spring release, marks a shift toward what Prime Minister Carney calls a “generational” investment in the country’s future. Framed as a plan to rebuild national capacity and competitiveness, the budget commits $450 billion in new spending—primarily on infrastructure, productivity and defense—while projecting a $78.3 billion deficit for 2025–26. This falls to $57.9 billion by 2028–29,but adds around $322 billion to Canada’s debt over that period (2025 to 2030). Total spending cuts are projected to be $60 billion over five years. Public debt charges are expected to rise by $22.7 billion during the same period, meaning that by 2030, Canada will be spending an estimated $1.46 billion per week on interest payments alone.

Carney also introduced a new method of reporting that separates operating expenses from capital investment spending, pledging to balance the operating budget within three years. Opinions are divided: critics call it an accounting manoeuvre to obscure underlying deficits, while supporters see it as a way to distinguish between spending that “sustains” from that which “builds” national capacity.

No changes were made to federal personal or corporate tax rates. The budget confirms the previously announced “middleclass tax cut,” reducing the lowest personal income tax rate (on income up to $57,375, for 2025) from 15 percent to 14.5 percent in 2025, and 14 percent in 2026.

Here are some of the more notable proposed income tax measures that may affect investors:

• Top-Up Tax Credit — A new non-refundable credit to effectively maintain the 15 percent rate for non-refundable tax credits claimed on amounts in excess of the first income tax bracket threshold. This prevents taxpayers—such as those claiming large one-time expenses (e.g., tuition)—from facing higher tax liability under the lowest bracket rate. This would apply for the 2025 to 2030 taxation years.

• Personal Support Workers (PSWs) Tax Credit — A temporary five-year refundable tax credit (2026 to 2030 tax years) for eligible PSWs working in approved health care facilities equal to 5 percent of eligible earnings, up to $1,100 annually. This excludes BC, NWT and NL, where bilateral agreements exist.

• Trusts & the 21-Year Rule — Broadens the anti-avoidance provisions for certain transactions involving trusts that aim to sidestep the 21-year deemed disposition rules.

• Bare Trust Reporting Deferral — Defers the bare trust reporting requirements by one year, applying to taxation years ending on or after December 31, 2026.

• Lifetime Capital Gains Exemption — Confirms the increase to the limit to $1.25 million (and indexed, starting in 2026), announced under Budget 2024.

• Canadian Entrepreneurs’ Incentive: Cancelled — Appears this incentive, originally proposed under Budget 2024, will not proceed.

• Luxury Tax Changes — Proposes to eliminate the luxury tax on aircraft and boats after November 4, 2025, while retaining the tax on automobiles.

• Underused Housing Tax Repealed — Proposes to eliminate this tax effective as of the 2025 calendar year. 

• Qualified Investments for Registered Plans: Small Business Investments — Starting 2027, proposes that investments in specified small business corporations,
venture capital corporations and specified cooperative corporations will be extended to RDSPs, aligning with other registered plans. However, investments in shares of eligible corporations and interests in small business investment limited partnerships and small business investment trusts will no longer be qualified investments.

• Home Accessibility Tax Credit — Before Budget 2025, it was possible to claim a tax credit for the same expense incurred under the medical expense tax credit and the home accessibility tax credit. From 2026, expenses claimed under the medical expense tax credit can no longer be claimed under the home accessibility tax credit.

For more information, please see: https://budget.canada.
ca/2025/report-rapport/intro-en.html

Note: At the time of writing, these proposals have not been enacted into law.

Recent Posts

June Market Insights: America at 250

merica reaches its 250th anniversary not as a fallen hegemon, but as the dominant centre of global hard power, monetary power, and frontier innovation. It still sits astride the world’s resource base through energy, agriculture, and continental depth; it still issues the reserve currency at the core of global trade and finance; and it still leads the race to build artificial intelligence (AI) as the next digital platform. Yet precisely because American power remains so large, the visible breakdown of the post–Second World War rules-based order has become impossible to ignore. To anyone who has read German historian and philosopher Oswald Spengler’s The Decline of the West (1918), this is not a surprise but a pattern: history is not a straight line of progress. Instead, it is the record of civilizations that rise as living cultures harden into systems and eventually exhaust the moral energy that made them great in the first place. America did not choose this time, but it has been born into it.

Read More »

May Market Insights: Mastery and the Terror Premium

Mastery of energy, again

Winston Churchill, as first lord of the Admiralty, tied Britain’s fate to Persian oil. United States President Donald Trump’s war in Iran, centred on Operation Epic Fury, could do the same for the West by removing Iran’s nuclear shadow, resetting oil toward US$60, and finally unlocking a modern peace dividend.

“Mastery itself was the prize of the venture.” Winston Churchill’s 1912–13 case for converting the Royal Navy from coal to oil—enshrined in historian Daniel Yergin’s The Prize: The Epic Quest for Oil, Money, and Power captured the brutal clarity of a great power energy strategy: accept dependence to command the seas. That wager framed the last century. In 2026, as Epic Fury grinds through the Gulf and Brent trades above US$100, the question is no longer whether oil confers mastery, but who holds it: a revolutionary theocracy astride the Strait of Hormuz, or a West intent on stripping the terror and nuclear risk now priced into every barrel out of the energy system—finally collecting a long‑deferred peace dividend.

Churchill’s shift bound Britain’s prosperity to distant wells and narrow waterways, welding energy supply to national survival. He understood that control of energy was not an adjunct to power, it was the metric. In April 2026, with Hormuz contested and Iranian missiles demonstrating reach beyond the Middle East, the same dilemma confronts policymakers and markets. Does the West still want that prize, and what is it prepared to stake to reclaim it from a regime that has spent half a century turning oil, terror, and nuclear brinkmanship into interchangeable tools of coercion? Assume Trump’s campaign does what it is now on course to do: not merely reopen a chokepoint, but neutralize a nascent tactical nuclear threat which, left intact, would hardwire a doomsday premium into global energy prices for a generation.

Iran’s war with the West has done what decades of shocks, embargoes, and “maximum pressure” could not: it has made the hidden tax on energy legible even on a Bloomberg screen. Strip out the terror and nuclear‑risk premiums in a post‑Trump‑Iran settlement, and Brent does not belong north of US$100; it sits much closer to the US$60 level implied by underlying supply and demand and pre‑war bank research. The gap between where oil trades in a world held hostage by a nuclear‑ambitious theocracy at Hormuz and where it would trade if flows were secure and de‑weaponized is more than a volatility surface. It is the unclaimed peace dividend of globalization, the energy market analogue of the windfall that followed the end of the Cold War, when the removal of an existential nuclear standoff released capital, confidence, and capacity back into the real economy.

The choice now facing the West is whether to lock in that outcome. Ending the Cold War removed the Sword of Damocles that had hung over every investment decision for half a century; a successful conclusion to Iran’s nuclear extortion would do something similar for the 21st‑century economy, collapsing a structural risk premium that has quietly taxed households, corporates, and sovereigns alike. The question, as Churchill would have recognized, is whether the West is prepared not just to win on the battlefield but to consolidate that victory into a new era of energy mastery, and to treat the potential verified removal of Iran’s enriched stockpile and fuel‑cycle capabilities as a security gain on the scale of the 1987 Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty or the dissolution of the Soviet arsenal.

For Europe, the stakes are not abstract. Iranian missiles and drones have already shown that European Union territory and NATO logistics hubs sit uncomfortably close to the new strike envelope, shattering the illusion that Gulf risk could be quarantined to energy prices alone. The deeper reckoning is with Europe’s own energy strategy. The choice by many Western governments to anchor industrial policy primarily on climate targets while neglecting cheap and secure supply—is now coming home to roost. Prosperity in an artificial intelligence (AI)‑driven economy rests on abundant, reliable energy rather than on cheap consumer imports, echoing Churchill’s insight that mastery of energy is mastery of power. That logic points north as well as east: Canada with its hydrocarbons, hydropower, and critical minerals—looks less like a peripheral supplier and more like a potential resource superpower if it can cut through regulatory thickets and build the infrastructure to deliver secure barrels, electrons, and metals to allied markets.

U.S. hard power, the security backstop European, Canadian, and the United Kingdom economies long treated as a law of nature, now looks more contingent, more politically conditional, and more thinly spread across theatres. One could easily imagine Washington reverting to a post‑First World War stance, turning inward to rebuild its real economy, and no longer willing or able to offer security as a global public good. A successful Trump‑led settlement that removes both the nuclear overhang and the Hormuz chokepoint as instruments of coercion would not only stabilize Atlantic world energy supply but also underwrite a more credible NATO deterrent at lower long‑run cost—replacing the ersatz “peace dividend” of underfunded defence with a genuine one built on reduced threat rather than wishful budgeting.

For investors, a decisive outcome in Iran would not just redraw maps in the Gulf; it would refashion term premia. As the nuclear and terror discounts bleed out of the curve, gilt yields and U.S. Treasuries alike would begin to reflect lower expected inflation and slimmer risk premia rather than recurring energy shocks. Credit spreads-particularly for energy‑intensive sectors and fragile sovereigns—would compress as balance of payments and default risks ease. Equity markets would reprice in turn: structurally lower input costs and a thinner geopolitical risk layer would lift margins in manufacturing, transport, and consumer names, even as oil majors and defence stocks surrender some of their crisis rent. For the Square Mile and Wall Street, the real prize is not another trade on US$120 Brent; it is the re‑rating that comes when a structural doomsday premium is finally taken out of the system and the peace dividend—deferred since the end of the Cold War and repeatedly eroded by Iran—at last starts to be paid in cash flows rather than communiqués.

Churchill’s ghost at Hormuz

On the first day of April 2026, as Brent traded just above US$100, the world was relearning what Churchill meant when he called mastery the prize. As first lord of the Admiralty, he forced the Royal Navy off domestic coal and onto Persian oil, then secured that lifeblood by buying control of Anglo‑Persian Oil. He knew the bargain: oil conferred speed and reach, but at the price of dependence on distant fields and fragile sea lanes. Hence his warning to Parliament in 1913 that “on no one quality, on no one process, on no one country, on no one route, and on no one field must we be dependent” and his insistence that safety and certainty in oil lay “in variety, and in variety alone.”

That decision created the modern energy system and placed Iran at its centre. Four decades later, as prime minister, Churchill confronted the second act of his own gamble when Iran’s prime minister Mohammad Mossadegh nationalized Anglo‑Iranian Oil Company’s assets. The 1953 coup that restored the Shah was less a morality play than a confirmation that control over Iranian oil would be contested by empires, nationalists, and, eventually, revolutionaries. Churchill’s instinct to secure supply at the source and to dominate the sea lanes that connected it to Britain established a strategic architecture with a simple premise: mastery of energy flows was indistinguishable from mastery of global power.

The twist came in 1979, when that architecture was seized by those it had previously constrained. The Iranian Revolution toppled the Shah and installed Ayatollah Khomeini’s theocracy—a regime that viewed the U.S. as the “Great Satan,” embraced terrorism as statecraft, and sat astride the Strait of Hormuz. Oil workers struck, production collapsed, and prices more than doubled. The world discovered that the geographic fulcrum Churchill had chosen could just as easily be pulled by a revolutionary fist. From that moment, the markets began to price an Iran terror premium. It was distinct from OPEC’s cartel pricing power or conventional war risk. It recognized that a state sponsor of terrorism—with a web of proxies and control over the narrow channel through which roughly a fifth of seaborne oil must pass—would periodically weaponize that position. Each tanker attack in the 1980s “Tanker War,” each Hezbollah bombing, each missile launched at a Gulf facility added a sliver to that premium. Over time, slivers hardened into a slab.

Churchill’s maxim was inverted. Variety still existed geologically, with new barrels from the North Sea, Alaska, and deepwater, but strategically the system was again anchored on a single actor most willing to turn energy into a cudgel. Where Churchill had sought safety through variety, the world lived with uncertainty concentrated in one revolutionary capital. And where he had seen mastery as the prize of bold, deliberate ventures, mastery of energy risk quietly migrated to a regime that treated terror as an operating model.

How terror became a line item

The terror premium is no longer an academic calculation; it is a visible spread. In calmer phases of the cycle, geopolitical risk barely nudges price forecasts. In crisis, as in early 2026, the gap between pre‑war expectations for oil and the levels seen when Hormuz is threatened yawns wider, and futures curves kink as traders try to price the possibility of disruption. Even if part of that is fear and temporality, the underlying message is obvious. There is a structural surcharge on every barrel to account for the probability that Tehran or one of its proxies will, at some point, take terrorist action.

That surcharge has a history. The 1973–74 oil embargo revealed how quickly geopolitics could quadruple prices, but Iran was then still an ally. The true discontinuity came with the 1979 revolution and the Iran‑Iraq War. The Tanker War saw mines in the Gulf, neutral shipping attacked, and U.S. naval forces drawn in to reflag and escort tankers. Washington’s 1984 decision to designate Iran a state sponsor of terrorism, off the back of Hezbollah’s bombing of U.S. Marines in Beirut, made explicit what markets had intuited: one of the central suppliers to the system was also its most committed saboteur.

Read More »

Highlights from the 2026 Spring Economic Update

On April 28, 2026, Finance and National Revenue Minister François-Philippe Champagne released the 2026
Spring Economic Update (the Update). This was the first spring economic update after the federal budget was
moved to the fall in 2025. In the absence of a federal budget earlier this year and with the recent shift to a
majority government, Canadians have been awaiting clear direction on the federal government’s policy
focus and anticipated initiatives. Overall, the Update introduces relatively little that had not been previously
announced, while showing an improved fiscal outlook, with the projected deficit declining despite $37.5 billion
in net new spending.

Read More »

April Market Insights: Bretton Woods 2.0, the New Great Game, and Trump

U.S. President Donald Trump’s second term is not just another burst of tariff theatre; it is the opening move in a new great game over energy, artificial intelligence (AI), and money. By neutralizing Iran and Venezuela, squeezing Cuba, binding Canada, and courting Russia, Washington is trying to re-anchor oil in U.S. dollars and push BRICS’ [1] monetary ambitions to the margins. Layered on top are digital rails—dollar-backed stablecoins, tokenized Treasuries, gold, and even a strategic bitcoin reserve—designed to harden, not retire, King Dollar. If it works, Bretton Woods 2.0 will arrive not as a conference, but as the unannounced sequel to a crisis-ridden decade, with the U.S. once again writing the rules.

Read More »

The information contained herein has been provided for information purposes only. The information has been drawn from sources believed to be reliable. Graphs, charts and other numbers are used for illustrative purposes only and do not reflect future values or future performance of any investment. The information does not provide financial, legal, tax or investment advice. Particular investment, tax, or trading strategies should be evaluated relative to each individual’s objectives and risk tolerance. This does not constitute a recommendation or solicitation to buy or sell securities of any kind. Market conditions may change which may impact the information contained in this document.  Wellington-Altus Private Wealth Inc. (WAPW) does not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of the information contained herein, nor does WAPW assume any liability for any loss that may result from the reliance by any person upon any such information or opinions.  Before acting on any of the above, please contact your financial advisor.

© 2024, Wellington-Altus Private Wealth Inc. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. NO USE OR REPRODUCTION WITHOUT PERMISSION.

www.wellington-altus.ca