Investing Foundations – Charging Fees on Cash

What We Believe

We believe advisory fees should reflect active oversight and management — not passive balances.

Clients should clearly understand how fees apply across all components of their portfolio, including cash.

 

The Background

In many advisory arrangements, management fees are applied to total assets under administration. This can include equities, fixed income, alternative strategies — and sometimes cash.

Cash may be held for several reasons:

• Short-term liquidity needs
• Working capital
• Pending investment deployment
• Income distributions
• Risk positioning during volatility

In some structures, advisory fees are applied uniformly across all assets — including cash balances — regardless of whether those balances require active portfolio management.

That approach may be administratively simple, but simplicity does not always equal alignment.

 

Why It Matters

Cash plays an important role in portfolio construction and liquidity management. However, it does not typically require the same level of active oversight as invested capital.

When advisory fees apply to idle or transitional cash without distinction, clients may unknowingly pay active management fees on assets that are not actively deployed.

Charging fees on cash is not inherently inappropriate. The key is clarity.

Clients benefit from understanding:

• Whether cash is included in fee calculations
• Whether certain cash vehicles are treated differently
• How working capital is structured
• How fee policy aligns with service delivery

 

The Bottom Line

Advisory fees should be intentional and transparent.

If you are a client or a prospective client of Forseth & Co. Wealth Strategies and would like to review how cash is treated within your portfolio — including whether management fees apply to cash balances and how that structure aligns with your expectations — we would welcome that discussion.

We manage your wealth. You focus on living.

 

 

.

Recent Posts

Investing Foundations – Understanding Product Choice

Wealth management firms operate under different product architectures.

Some institutions emphasize proprietary products manufactured internally. Others use open architecture frameworks, drawing from a broader universe of external managers and strategies.

Neither approach is inherently right or wrong. Each reflects a different business model, incentive structure, and operational philosophy.

However, clients often do not fully understand how product decisions are made within their portfolios — or whether alternatives are evaluated systematically.

Read More »

The information contained herein has been provided for information purposes only.  The information has been drawn from sources believed to be reliable.  Graphs, charts and other numbers are used for illustrative purposes only and do not reflect future values or future performance of any investment.  The information does not provide financial, legal, tax or investment advice.  Particular investment, tax, or trading strategies should be evaluated relative to each individual’s objectives and risk tolerance.  This does not constitute a recommendation or solicitation to buy or sell securities of any kind. Market conditions may change which may impact the information contained in this document.  Wellington-Altus Private Wealth Inc. (WAPW) does not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of the information contained herein, nor does WAPW assume any liability for any loss that may result from the reliance by any person upon any such information or opinions.  Before acting on any of the above, please contact your financial advisor.

© 2026, Wellington-Altus Private Wealth Inc.  ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.  NO USE OR REPRODUCTION WITHOUT PERMISSION. 

www.wellington-altus.ca