Search
Close this search box.

Newswire

Intergenerational Business Transfers: Where are we now?

The transfer of family businesses to the next generation has long been a contentious tax issue. Owners rightfully expect the same tax benefits when selling their businesses to their children or other relatives as if they had sold to a third-party purchaser. Fiscal policy, meanwhile, aims to ensure that such sales to family are authentic and that business owners don’t use transfers “in form” only to extract corporate surplus in a tax-preferred manner, a practice known as surplus stripping.

With over 60% of family enterprises expected to change hands in the next decade1, the need to strike a balance between facilitating legitimate intergenerational business transfers and preventing surplus stripping has become a pressing one. Enter the 2023 Federal Budget, which introduced a framework of rules within which genuine intergenerational transfers may occur while discouraging surplus stripping via an artificial transfer. The proposed rules also mean that business owners will be limited in how they transition their business to the next generation and when they step away from management and control.

Two new possible transfer routes

The new framework applies where an individual Vendor sells shares of “a qualified small business corporation” (QSBC) or “the capital stock of a family farm or fishing corporation” (QFFP) (i.e., shares that qualify for the Lifetime Capital Gain Exemption (LCGE)) which they control both legally (>50% of voting shares) and in fact (exert controlling influence), to a corporation controlled by one or more of their “Children” (18 years or older).

“Children” includes grandchildren, nieces and nephews and their children, and spouses or common-law partners of any Children.

To apply the framework and receive the desired tax consequences, the Vendor and Children must file a joint election selecting the desired transfer route and meet certain requirements for the transfer of control, management, and economic interest in the business, as well as the retention of control and active involvement in the business by the Children.

The proposed rules provide for two possible intergenerational business transfer routes:

  1. An immediate intergenerational business transfer akin to an arm’s length sale. In effect, ownership and control is transferred on sale and management is transitioned over 36 months.
  2. gradual intergenerational business transfer that mimics an estate freeze with redemption over time. The Vendor’s economic interest in the corporation becomes fixed at the time of sale and must be reduced below certain thresholds within 10 years. The Vendor can continue to exert influence over the business post-sale but must fully transition management within 60 months.

The new rules apply starting on January 1, 2024. For those wanting more flexibility in transferring their businesses to the next generation, planning should be completed by the end of 2023.

Choosing a transfer route

The choice of transfer route depends on the intentions of the Vendor and the Children. With either route, the Vendor must sell the majority (>50%) of participating equity interests and voting shares of the corporation immediately, and the remainder within 36 months.

CHOOSE

Immediate intergenerational business transfer if…

• The time horizon for transitioning the business
is 0-3 years.

• The Vendor is prepared to relinquish legal and factual control of the business immediately.

• The Vendor does not want to be tied to a timeline for reducing their fixed economic interest in the corporation (in the form of non-voting fixed value preferred shares).

• The Vendor intends to fully transfer management of the business within 36 months.2

• The Vendor’s Children are ready and willing to:

– maintain control of the corporation and purchaser corporation;

– carry on the business; and

– be actively engaged in the business3 for at least
36 months.2

Gradual intergenerational business transfer if…

• The time horizon for transitioning the business is up to 10 years.

• The Vendor wants to maintain factual control and influence over the business.

• The Vendor’s fixed economic interest in the corporation is reduced below 30% of the pre-sale value of QSBC shares, or 50% for QFFP shares (“final sale time”) within 10 years.

• The Vendor wishes to be involved in the management of the business for longer (up to 60 months).2

• The Vendor’s Children are ready and willing to:

– maintain control of the corporation and purchaser corporation;

– carry on the business; and

– be actively engaged in the business3 for at least

– 60 months or until the final sale time, if later.2

What are the planning benefits?

If all the conditions are met, the Vendor:

✓ Receives capital gains treatment on the sale, instead of paying higher dividend tax rates.

✓ Can claim their LCGE on the sale to the extent available.

✓ Can use the capital gains reserve over 10 years, rather than the usual five years.

Know before you buy!

At least one purchasing Child must remain active in the business throughout the first 36 or 60 months following the sale. Should the Child decide that running a business is not for them, or if the business fails within that period, the Vendor will lose the favourable tax treatment of a genuine intergenerational business transfer. The Child is then jointly and severally liable with the Vendor for any additional tax liability that results.

There are several tax and estate planning elements to consider when transitioning your business. Whether you are planning to retire in the near term or several years from now, your Wellington-Altus advisor has the resources to help you ask the right questions and identify the next steps for a seamless transfer to the next generation.

[1] Family Enterprise Foundation, “Ready, Willing And Interested – or Not? Canadian Family Business Transition Intentions” 2021.
[2] There are exceptions in the event of an arm’s length sale or the death or disability of the Child.
[3] Though not required of all Children, at least one of the purchasing Children must be active in the business.

Recent Posts

September Market Insights: Trump’s Trade War

Tales of empires are as old as civilization itself. From ancient Mesopotamia to Rome, from the Mongols to the British, history is replete with stories of great powers that rose to dominate vast swaths of territory, only to eventually crumble under the weight of their ambitions. The United States of America, as the preeminent global superpower of the modern era, finds itself at a critical juncture in this age-old narrative.

Read More »

August Market Insights: Trump’s Fiscal Frenzy

At this very moment, the U.S. faces a fiscal predicament which urgently calls for proactive measures following the 2024 presidential election. The nation’s mounting debt crisis demands immediate attention, yet neither party has outlined a clear strategy to address this pressing issue. This election cycle has had no shortage of historic events, from the attempted assassination of Former President and Republican Nominee Donald Trump to Vice President Kamala Harris replacing President Joe Biden as the Democratic Nominee. Yet the underlying fiscal dilemma, if left unaddressed, risks triggering an economic crisis that even Wall Street may be underestimating—dismissing U.S. debt concerns as mere cautionary tales.

Read More »

July Market Insights: Navigating The Dual Revolutions

Mark Twain once delivered a sobering reminder of humanity’s tendency to disregard transformative ideas while allowing misconceptions to persist. As we stand on the precipice of two seismic shifts—the AI revolution and an impending fiscal storm—his words resonate profoundly.

Read More »

June Market Insights: The Grand Chessboard

In the complex arena of global finance, as in geopolitics, strategic positioning can be just as crucial as raw power. This insight comes from Polish-American diplomat and political scientist Zbigniew Brzezinski in his book The Grand Chessboard, which offers a compelling parallel to the world of investing. Brzezinski’s analogy paints a vivid picture where nations are likened to chess pieces, with their geographic locations and potential weaknesses playing a pivotal role in the grand strategy of international relations.

Read More »

May Market Insights: Out Of Options

U.S. Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell, deeply mindful of Arthur Burns’ missteps and inspired by Paul Volcker’s tenacity, is fully cognisant of the historical significance of his role. I have consistently argued that Powell would benefit from studying William McChesney Martin’s tenure as the first post-Second World War Federal Reserve Chair in the 1950s. Martin adeptly navigated through a period of fiscal dominance, a pattern that is emerging once again. As Sir Winston Churchill implied, focusing on the wrong historical period can lead to policy errors and financial turmoil.

Read More »

The information contained herein has been provided for information purposes only. The information has been drawn from sources believed to be reliable. Graphs, charts and other numbers are used for illustrative purposes only and do not reflect future values or future performance of any investment. The information does not provide financial, legal, tax or investment advice. Particular investment, tax, or trading strategies should be evaluated relative to each individual’s objectives and risk tolerance. This does not constitute a recommendation or solicitation to buy or sell securities of any kind. Wellington-Altus Private Wealth Inc. (WAPW) does not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of the information contained herein, nor does WAPW assume any liability for any loss that may result from the reliance by any person upon any such information or opinions.  Before acting on any of the above, please contact your financial advisor.

© 2024, Wellington-Altus Private Wealth Inc. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. NO USE OR REPRODUCTION WITHOUT PERMISSION.
www.wellington-altus.ca