Newswire

Donating Shares: A Tax-Efficient Form of Philanthropy

WA-Featured-Image

Download this article as a PDF.

When it comes to philanthropy, Canadians today are more intentional, want to see the impact of their gift, and are giving more. With intentional philanthropy, clients should address the following questions:

  • When do they wish to give?
    Today, next year, or in their Will?
  • How do they wish to give? Through a one-time donation, a regular monthly/ annual donation, or by naming the charity as a beneficiary on a particular account or life insurance policy?
  • Who should give? An individual, a family corporation or trust?
  • How should the gift be funded? Through cash, donations in-kind of securities, ecologically sensitive land or cultural property?

Consider this scenario:

Marija and Steve were grateful that their business had done well over the last two decades and their children were independent. They reached out as they were interested in making a $25,000 donation to a charity that they, and their families, had benefited from over the years. They requested $25,000 be withdrawn from their non-registered investment account and deposited into their chequing account.

What should Marija and Steve consider in maximizing their donation, and the benefit of such?

If they decide to make their donation personally, they could fund it with cash, by selling securities from their non-registered account, or by donating shares in-kind.

Here is a summary of the tax reporting or overall cost of making the donation these three ways:

Personal donation options

Looking at the above three scenarios, the preferred method would be for Marija and Steve to donate shares in-kind with a fair market value of $25,000. This method optimizes the fact that the inclusion rate on the capital gain is 0% for shares donated in-kind, as opposed to 50% if the shares were first sold and then the proceeds donated. As a result, Marija and Steve benefit twice – first, they will pay no tax on the capital gain, and secondly, they will receive the same charitable tax credit as they would have received by donating $25,000 cash.

Marija and Steve also have a successful business corporation with a non-registered account and wonder if it would be more tax-efficient for the corporation to make the donation. What matters most is that the donation is made. Here is a breakdown of the tax reporting or overall cost to the corporation of making the donation:

Corporate Donation Options:

Corporate donation options

There are two notable distinctions to highlight when a corporation funds a donation, namely:

  • a donation is a tax deduction to a corporation as opposed to a tax credit for an individual; and
  • the tax-free portion of any capital gain is added to the corporation’s Capital Dividend Account, which allows a tax-free dividend to be declared and paid out to the corporation’s shareholders.

Looking at the above three scenarios, the preferred method again would be to donate shares with a fair market value of $25,000. Marija and Steve’s corporation pays no tax on the capital gain and the corporation receives the same charitable tax credit as they would have received by donating $25,000 cash. The corporation can then pay out $7,500 to Marija and Steve tax free given the Capital Dividend Account increase.

As highlighted, there are many factors to consider when contemplating a charitable donation. Please reach out to your Wellington-Altus advisor to discuss further.

The years in your life are less important than the life in your years.
RALPH WALDO EMERSON

Recent Posts

August Market Insights: Trump’s Fiscal Frenzy

At this very moment, the U.S. faces a fiscal predicament which urgently calls for proactive measures following the 2024 presidential election. The nation’s mounting debt crisis demands immediate attention, yet neither party has outlined a clear strategy to address this pressing issue. This election cycle has had no shortage of historic events, from the attempted assassination of Former President and Republican Nominee Donald Trump to Vice President Kamala Harris replacing President Joe Biden as the Democratic Nominee. Yet the underlying fiscal dilemma, if left unaddressed, risks triggering an economic crisis that even Wall Street may be underestimating—dismissing U.S. debt concerns as mere cautionary tales.

Read More »

July Market Insights: Navigating The Dual Revolutions

Mark Twain once delivered a sobering reminder of humanity’s tendency to disregard transformative ideas while allowing misconceptions to persist. As we stand on the precipice of two seismic shifts—the AI revolution and an impending fiscal storm—his words resonate profoundly. The true potential of artificial intelligence may be vastly underestimated and dismissed as hype, while fears about its impact remain entrenched. Simultaneously, the era of unbridled deficit spending is ending, and conventional wisdom about fiscal policy faces an upheaval that could shake financial markets to their core.

Read More »

June Market Insights: The Grand Chessboard

In the complex arena of global finance, as in geopolitics, strategic positioning can be just as crucial as raw power. This insight comes from Polish-American diplomat and political scientist Zbigniew Brzezinski in his book The Grand Chessboard, which offers a compelling parallel to the world of investing. Brzezinski’s analogy paints a vivid picture where nations are likened to chess pieces, with their geographic locations and potential weaknesses playing a pivotal role in the grand strategy of international relations.

Read More »

May Market Insights: Out Of Options

U.S. Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell, deeply mindful of Arthur Burns’ missteps and inspired by Paul Volcker’s tenacity, is fully cognisant of the historical significance of his role. I have consistently argued that Powell would benefit from studying William McChesney Martin’s tenure as the first post-Second World War Federal Reserve Chair in the 1950s. Martin adeptly navigated through a period of fiscal dominance, a pattern that is emerging once again. As Sir Winston Churchill implied [1], focusing on the wrong historical period can lead to policy errors and financial turmoil.

Read More »

The information contained herein has been provided for information purposes only. The information has been drawn from sources believed to be reliable. Graphs, charts and other numbers are used for illustrative purposes only and do not reflect future values or future performance of any investment. The information does not provide financial, legal, tax or investment advice. Particular investment, tax, or trading strategies should be evaluated relative to each individual’s objectives and risk tolerance. This does not constitute a recommendation or solicitation to buy or sell securities of any kind. Market conditions may change which may impact the information contained in this document.  Wellington-Altus Private Wealth Inc. (WAPW) does not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of the information contained herein, nor does WAPW assume any liability for any loss that may result from the reliance by any person upon any such information or opinions.  Before acting on any of the above, please contact your financial advisor.

© 2024, Wellington-Altus Private Wealth Inc. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. NO USE OR REPRODUCTION WITHOUT PERMISSION.

www.wellington-altus.ca